MNEA successfully holds levy against anti-public
education legislation
Missouri NEA fought throughout the 2008 legislative session
for its priorities for children and public education. A key
focus was protecting the recently reclaimed collective bargaining
rights for all education employees. Many proponents of anti-public
education schemes regarded the 2008 legislative session as
their last opportunity to implement those harmful provisions
before the 2008 elections.
The possible election of Attorney General Jay Nixon as a
pro-public education governor and election of more pro-public
education legislators to both the House and Senate in November
2008 offer the possibility that 2009 and following years will
offer fewer opportunities for those attacks on public education
to move forward in the legislature.
Get
more details
For a summary of what passed and what didn't among education
bills and related issue areas of interst, visit www.mnea.org/publications/legislative/
find supporting detail about specific bills at www.house.mo.gov/billcentral.aspx.
Type the bill number (ex.HB1100) or sponsor name in
the search box to find a link to the bill. This link
will take you to a "home page" for the bill
that provides bill text, bill summaries, fiscal notes
and information on legislative action on the bill. |
In the 2008 session, legislators not supportive of public
education launched anti-public education attacks with renewed
intensity. In a session where success was primarily measured
in the defeat of undesirable bills, the MNEA was successful
in stopping nearly all of those harmful proposals. MNEA also
sought to build relationships with legislators in support
of a consensus to support children, adequately fund public
education and respect the rights of education employees. More
than 1,000 members supported the Association’s efforts
by coming to the MNEA Capitol Action Days, calling legislators
or sending e-mails in response to legislative-action alerts.
In addition, the daily Legislative Update provided timely
information by e-mail to more than 1,000 MNEA members and
other education stakeholders.
What’s next?
Public educators must continue their work to squelch extreme
attacks on education and the public sector. Association members
must step up and lead the effort by getting involved in the
2008 election. To ensure a more promising 2009 legislative
session, education employees need to focus their efforts on
electing legislators and candidates who are willing to support
children, adequately fund public schools and respect education
employee rights. By supporting and electing pro-education
candidates with time and money, MNEA members can help elect
a legislature that will lead Missouri forward to workable
solutions for prosperity, access and possibility.
MNEA protects bargaining rights against
MSTA anti-bargaining bill
Missouri NEA’s highest legislative priority in 2008
was to protect the newly restored collective bargaining rights
for public education employees. In a historic decision in
May 2007, the Missouri Supreme Court restored the right of
all public employees (including teachers) to bargain collectively
with employers. In contrast, MSTA fought against collective
bargaining for years and filed a brief last year urging the
Missouri Supreme Court to deny teachers a voice in the collective
bargaining process.
MSTA would still prefer that school employee bargaining rights
go away, and to that end they drafted and supported Senate
Bill 1158 (Rob Mayer) and House Bill 2059 (Kevin Wilson).
Both bills would have denied all Missouri teachers the opportunity
to select a bargaining representative of their choosing through
a free and uncoerced election. MNEA leaders, staff and members
stepped up and lobbied strenuously to defeat those bills.
H.B. 2059 managed to squeak through the House but was stopped
in the Senate Education Committee without enough support to
gain passage.
H.B. 2059 discriminates against teachers by treating them
unfairly, denying them their right to freely elect a bargaining
representative and restricting their bargaining rights in
ways imposed on no other public or private employees. The
bill is also impractical and unworkable and will disrupt successful
relationships in many of our largest school districts.
An effective bargaining process must have a unified employee
voice. Piecing a bargaining team together from various groups,
as both the above bills propose, builds a communications gap
into the process and leaves teachers scrambling for a cohesive
voice. The bill would force teachers to form an unelected
representative council, an extra layer of bureaucracy, which
would make reaching agreement difficult if not impossible.
Of the 35 states where teachers bargain collectively, no state
mandates a process similar to the one proposed in MSTA’s
bills.
The bargaining model that has proven effective over time
in state after state is the exclusive representation model.
MNEA believes that H.B. 2030 (Jenee` Lowe) and S.B. 1115 (Joan
Bray) would treat all employees affected by the Court decision
fairly. H.B. 2030 and S.B. 1115 were built on consensus among
public employee groups, including teachers. MNEA believes
every child has the basic right to attend a great public school,
and nothing should dilute the voice of teachers in how that
is accomplished. The Association needs strong member involvement
in the 2008 election cycle to elect more pro-public education
legislators who will support adequate funding for public education
and respect the constitutional bargaining rights of all public
education employees.
by Otto
Fajen
MNEA legislative director
sb,
summer '08
|