|
MSTA
ANTI-BARGAINING BILL REMAINS IN SENATE COMMITTEE
The Senate Education Committee completed its hearing
on House Committee Substitute for House Bill 2059 (Kevin
Wilson) on May 7, but no motion was made to vote the
bill out of committee after the hearing was completed.
The bill may now lack sufficient support in the committee
to be passed out, and the chances for the bill’s
passage appear to be dwindling. MNEA will need to continue
the lobbying effort on the issue for the final week
of session to ensure that H.B. 2059 does not pass this
session as an amendment to another bill.
Missouri
NEA opposes H.B. 2059. The bill discriminates against
teachers by treating them unfairly, denying them their
right to freely elect a bargaining representative and
restricting their bargaining rights in ways imposed
on no other public or private employees. The bill is
also impractical and unworkable and will disrupt successful
relationships in many of our largest school districts.
MNEA’s diligent lobbying effort helped distance
several committee members from the bill and caused others
to express a belief that the bill should not be moved
forward this session.
An
effective bargaining process must have a unified employee
voice. Piecing a bargaining team together from various
groups builds a communications gap into the process
and leaves teachers scrambling for a cohesive voice.
The bill would force teachers to form a representative
council, an extra layer of bureaucracy, which would
make reaching agreement difficult.
The
bill would make collective bargaining a more difficult
and less effective process for teachers than for other
employees, and it leaves them, once again, with fewer
rights than other public employees. Unlike an elected
representative, whose right to represent employees can
be removed if it fails to represent them fairly, the
council cannot be held accountable, disbanded or replaced
with an elected representative organization, even if
the council is totally dysfunctional.
Of
the 35 states where teachers bargain collectively, no
state mandates a process similar to the one proposed
in these bills. The bargaining model that has proven
effective over time in state after state is the exclusive
representation model. In a historic decision in May
2007, the Missouri Supreme Court restored the right
of all public employees (including teachers) to bargain
collectively with employers. MSTA fought against collective
bargaining for years and filed a brief last year urging
the Supreme Court to deny teachers a voice in the collective
bargaining process.
Action
needed:
Your help is needed. If you haven't already done
so, please call, write or e-mail to urge your
state senator to oppose HCS/H.B. 2059 and Senate
Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 1158, the
teacher anti-bargaining bills. The following link
will connect you to the MNEA Legislative Action
Center Action Alert on S.B. 1158 and H.B. 2059.
The action alert contains a brief summary and
an editable message box to help you send an e-mail
to your state representative and state senator
on the issue. http://capwiz.com/nea/mo/issues/alert/?alertid=11232261&type=ST |
STATE
BOARD OF MEDIATION APPOINTMENT
Gov. Matt Blunt recently appointed Rep. Jim Avery to
be the chair of the State Board of Mediation. The State
Board of Mediation is the state entity that oversees
public sector collective bargaining in Missouri. The
board conducts representation elections and serves as
the appellate body for disputes of bargaining unit determination
for employees currently covered under the public sector
bargaining law. Education support personnel are currently
covered under the public sector bargaining law, while
teachers are specifically excluded.
Rep.
Avery’s appointment must receive the “advice
and consent” of the Missouri Senate, and the appointment
was considered by the Senate Gubernatorial Appointments
Committee on May 7. Rep. Avery’s appointment will
help fill a void in state support for public sector
bargaining. The fiscal year 2009 budget also includes
funding for the State Board of Mediation. Rep. Avery’s
appointment has the support of MNEA and many other groups
within the public sector labor community. His appointment
is generally seen as a positive step in supporting fair
implementation of the public sector labor law.
STATE
BUDGET NOW PASSED
All state budget bills were approved by May 8, one day
ahead of the constitutional deadline. The bills are
finally passed and will be sent to the governor for
approval. Unlike regular bills, the governor has line-item-veto
power to veto individual spending items in appropriations
bills.
Meanwhile,
the Office of Administration released disappointing
and troubling news on May 2 when it reported that April
2008 state general revenues were 9.8 percent below corresponding
figures for April 2007. This significant decline reduced
the year-to-date increase in general revenue down to
2.2 percent and raises concern that the state revenue
may not meet the “consensus revenue estimate,”
a term that refers to the revenue estimate on which
the budget is based. Without sufficient revenue, the
newly elected governor may be forced to withhold spending
authority to state agencies next fiscal year to trim
state spending down to the available revenues.
TABOR
The Senate Governmental Affairs and Fiscal Oversight
Committee continued its hearing on House Joint Resolution
70 (Allen Icet) on May 6. The committee met in executive
session on May 7, but no motion was made to vote the
HJR out, which indicates that the measure is unlikely
to move forward during the remainder of the session.
HJR
70 is a constitutional spending limit similar to the
Colorado provision known as “TABOR,” or
the so-called “Taxpayer Bill of Rights.”
The HJR would impose a permanent, constitutional spending
limit on state government and would limit annual growth
in state appropriations to a cost-of-living adjustment
factor plus a population growth factor. The HJR even
includes requirements for imposing further tax cuts
if the spending limits are operational.
Missouri
NEA strongly opposes this unneeded restriction. Legislators
should be able to construct a consensus revenue estimate
and appropriate according to that estimate. HJR 70’s
limit would cause Missouri government to shrink year
after year relative to the size of the overall economy.
This measure will permanently diminish the state’s
capacity to provide appropriate levels of public service
and will ultimately make the state a less desirable
place to live and reduce the state’s ability to
attract desirable employers.
JOINT
COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
The Joint Committee on Education met on May 6 and selected
Sen. Rob Mayer as chair and Rep. Scott Muschany as vice-chair.
The
committee also heard a presentation from the Department
of Elementary and Secondary Education commissioner Kent
King regarding the commissioner’s proposal on
how to cut expenditures for professional development
and other critical needs now that the funding for those
programs has been cut from $20 million to $15 million
for fiscal year 2009. The commissioner’s proposed
cuts included across-the-board cuts of roughly 25 percent
for many programs, while some smaller programs were
scheduled for elimination.
The
discussion was precipitated by Gov. Matt Blunt signing
Senate Bill 1066 into law. S.B. 1066 gives the joint
committee authority to oversee those expenditures beginning
on Aug. 28, 2008. Since the grants are generally approved
at the May meeting of the State Board of Education and
many staff positions are already under contract or will
be within the month, the joint committee will seek to
weigh in soon after the state board acts on the recommended
funding list in late May with any concerns to ensure
that there are no surprises when the joint committee’s
oversight authority goes into effect on August 28.
EARLY
CHILD CARE
The House Special Committee on Family Services met on
May 7 to hear two bills:
- House
Bill 2264 (Jeff Grisamore) increases eligibility for
child care subsidy benefits for the working poor.
The bill raises the eligibility cap to 185 percent
of federal poverty level. Missouri NEA supports this
effort to improve access to quality early childhood
education.
- Senate
Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for Senate
Bill 726 (Charlie Shields) creates a quality rating
system for child care facilities. MNEA supports the
bill as a positive step in improving the quality of
early childhood education programs across the state.
The
committee reconvened after session on May 7 to complete
executive session and voted out a House Committee Substitute
version of S.B. 726 to create a quality rating system
for child care facilities.
LEGISLATIVE
ACCOUNTABILITY DODGE
The Senate Pensions, Veterans’ Affairs and General
Laws Committee heard House Joint Resolution 41 (Jane
Cunningham) on May 7. The committee voted out a Senate
Committee Substitute version of the resolution in executive
session on May 8. The joint resolution, if passed by
both chambers and approved by statewide vote, will prohibit
a state court from instructing or ordering the state
legislature or any local government to levy or increase
taxes. The amendment will also prohibit any Missouri
court from instructing or ordering the state or any
local government on how to spend, allocate or budget
fiscal resources.
The
HJR is an obvious attempt to avoid accountability for
the failure to meet the constitutional demand to adequately
and equitably fund public education. HJR 41 would undermine
the fundamental balance of governmental powers and leave
the people of Missouri with no legal recourse to hold
the legislature accountable for failure to live up to
its constitutional obligations. Missouri NEA strongly
opposes HJR 41.
VOTER
ID RESTRICTIONS
The House hastily revived dormant House Joint Resolution
48 (Stanley Cox) in response to a Missouri Supreme Court
ruling handed down recently regarding the permissibility
of voter ID restrictions. The resolution was perfected
on May 7 and finally passed on May 8. The HJR requires
any person seeking to vote in a public election to provide
election officials a driver’s license or other
government-issued photo identification. Missouri NEA
believes voting is a constitutional right that should
not be restricted by unnecessary voter photo identification
requirements or other additional barriers to the voting
franchise.
The
Missouri Supreme Court struck down the photo voter identification
requirements enacted in Senate Bill 1019 (2006) as an
unconstitutional restriction on voter access and found
that this measure would have disproportionately suppressed
voter turnout of the poor, minority and elderly voters.
MNEA opposes any attempt to enact further voter ID restrictions
or other measures that would have the effect of suppressing
voter turnout among the most vulnerable of our citizens.
CAPITOL
ACTION DAYS
Capitol Action Days conclude on May 13 with MNEA members
from Governance District 11 visiting the Capitol. A
series of Capitol Action Days throughout most of the
session have allowed planned, face-to-face contact with
legislators throughout the session. Each Capitol Action
Day will start with a briefing at 10:00 a.m. to provide
you with the most up-to-date information.
FINDING
INFORMATION ABOUT BILLS
To find out more about legislation this session, go
to: http://www.mnea.org/gr/legissues.htm.
This page contains numerous links, including: the NEA
Legislative Action Center, which addresses key education
issues at the federal level; and, the Missouri NEA Legislative
Action Center, which will address key education issues
at the state level. This page contains links to legislative
updates, the MNEA Legislative Platform, legislative
priorities and other policy-related links.
To
find information about a specific bill currently pending
before the Missouri General Assembly, go to: http://www.house.mo.gov/billcentral.aspx.
Type the bill number (example: HB1000) or sponsor name
in the “search” box to find a link to the
bill. This link will take you to a “home page”
for the bill that provides bill text, bill summaries,
fiscal notes and information on legislative action on
the bill.
|