|
TAX CREDIT VOUCHER BILL DEBATE EXPECTED IN HOUSE
The House did not debate House Bill 808 (Carl Bearden) this
week. H.B. 808 is the newest version of the tax credit voucher
bill. An interesting confluence of interests raises questions
about whether the bill will actually come to a vote in the
House. Various voucher advocacy groups, such as All Children
Matter, have invested heavily in recent electoral campaigns
in an effort to create a pro-voucher legislature. Rex Sinquefield
of the Show Me Institute, an extremist think tank pushing
school vouchers, regressive tax changes and diminished public
services, has formed a new venture and hired several lobbyists
to push his extreme agenda at the Capitol. House Speaker Rod
Jetton created a special committee designed especially to
vote the bill out quickly. However, many majority party representatives
from rural parts of the state prefer not to have to vote in
favor of the bill, since their public education leaders are
all strongly opposed to the bill. These representatives fear
the likely electoral backlash if they vote for the bill this
session due to the immense pressure from majority caucus leaders
and the well-funded advocacy groups supporting the bill.
H.B. 808
is the newest version of the tax credit voucher bill. This
year, the bill is once again known as the “Betty L.
Thompson Scholarship Program.” Serving as this year’s
version of the “65% Deception,” the bill would
create a 65 percent tax credit for donations to private scholarship
funds providing payments for low-income students in unaccredited
or provisionally accredited districts to attend private or
religious schools or out-of-district public schools. The bill
allows up to $40 million per year in tax credits for “contributions”
to scholarship funds to be used to fund private and religious
school tuition payments for low-income students in St. Louis
City and Kansas City.
This bill
does nothing to fulfill the state’s primary duty: to
establish and maintain quality public schools. The credits
would reduce state revenues by a like amount, reduce funds
for the affected public schools and force the state to forego
real opportunities to help all public school students or to
fund specific programs to help struggling students in urban
public schools, such as early childhood education or after
school programs.
Missouri
NEA strongly opposes H.B. 808 and any measure to transfer
state funds to private, religious or home schools that are
not accountable to all the standards placed on public schools.
Action
needed:
If you have not done so, please call, write or e-mail
to urge your state representative to oppose H.B. 808,
the new tax credit voucher proposal. The following link
will connect you to the MNEA Legislative Action Center
Action Alert on H.B.808. The action alert contains a brief
summary and an editable message box to help you send an
e-mail to your state representative on the issue. http://capwiz.com/nea/mo/issues/alert/?alertid=9277446&type=ST&show_alert=1 |
SENATE
LEADERS PONDER SURGERY OR EUTHANASIA FOR HOUSE PENSION TAX
CUT BILL
The House passed House Committee Substitute for House Bill
444 et al. on Feb. 22 by a vote of 129-28. The fiscal note
for the perfected HCS shows that, after adoption of several
amendments to exempt more pension income, the bill now has
an estimated cost, under a revised fiscal note, of about $300
million in 2008, considerably higher than either the original
bill or the committee version.
The bill
exempts all Social Security pensions from income tax, along
with other public employee pensions not eligible for Social
Security, such as the Public School Retirement System, and
up to $6,000 in income from individual retirement accounts.
The fiscal impact will increase rapidly over time as Baby
Boomers reach retirement age.
Passage
of the House version of the bill would spell imminent budget
disaster for the state. While the state is likely to have
a significant ending balance of roughly $500 million this
fiscal year (F.Y. 07), reasonable revenue and budget assumptions
indicate that H.B. 444 would eliminate that balance within
12 months (by the end of F.Y. 08) and leave the state with
a huge shortfall in the following budget year (F.Y. 09). Missouri
NEA continues to oppose HCS/H.B.444 due to the generally regressive
nature of the tax changes and the enormous harm the bill will
due to adequacy of state revenues.
In the
coming weeks, attention will turn to the Senate for deliberation
on the bill. Senate leaders appear to be considering two options:
1) no tax cut at all or 2) passing a tax cut exempting only
Social Security income and non-Social Security pensions such
as PSRS (with an overall cost of about $120 million per year
or less), with some or all of the following features: an eligible
income cap of around $75,000, a six-year phase-in period and
annual general revenue growth targets.
HOUSE
BEGINS DEBATE ON ALTERNATIVE CERTIFICATION BILL (ABCTE)
The House briefly took up House Committee Substitute for House
Bill 620 (Scott Muschany) for debate and then laid the bill
over. H.B. 620 requires the State Board of Education to create
another alternative teacher certification based on certification
by the American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence
(ABCTE) and to establish mentoring standards for beginning
teachers and principals. Debate will likely continue later
in the week.
Missouri
NEA opposes creation of another alternative certification
program that lacks adequate requirements to ensure those teachers
are properly trained in essential teaching competencies before
achieving full certification. Missouri NEA continues to recommend
that elementary and early childhood certifications be excluded
from any alternate certification and that all alternatively
certified teachers should have to pass the Praxis II exam
and complete a course of study that covers all key teaching
competencies before being given a full teaching certificate.
Also,
Missouri NEA supports establishing state teaching standards,
so state policy is clear on what teachers are supposed to
know and be able to do, how those standards will be assessed,
and how mentoring, beginning teacher assistance programs and
other professional development will help teachers meet those
teaching standards.
Action
needed:
If you have not done so, please call, write or e-mail
to urge your state representative to oppose HCS/H.B.620,
the ABCTE certification mandate that lowers teacher standards.
The following link will connect you to the MNEA Legislative
Action Center Action Alert on H.B.620. The action alert
contains a brief summary and an editable message box to
help you send an e-mail to your state representative on
the issue.
http://capwiz.com/nea/mo/issues/alert/?alertid=9446096&type=ST&show_alert=1 |
MACCE
The Senate Education Committee will hear Senate Bill 111 (Scott
Rupp) on Wednesday, March 7. The bill will eliminate the Missouri
Advisory Council for the Certification of Educators and establish
the Commissioner's Advisory Council on Teacher Quality within
the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Missouri
NEA continues to oppose the elimination of MACCE as this change
would create a council with even less autonomy and diminish
the participation of higher education institutions. Also,
the bill will move the state even farther away from the Missouri
NEA’s goal regarding certification standards: the establishment
of an independent Professional Standards Board composed of
a majority of actual teachers, which would be empowered to
set high state standards for teaching and teacher certification.
HOUSE
HIGHER EDUCATION
The House Higher Education Committee met on Feb. 27 to hear
the following bills:
- House
Bill 181 (Therese Sander) requires captioning of electronic
video instructional material.
- H.B.
213 (Jane Cunningham) establishes the "Emily Brooker
Intellectual Diversity Act," which defines intellectual
diversity for reporting purposes at public higher education
institutions. This bill adds a dozen state-level mandates
regarding bureaucratic requirements for addressing “intellectual
diversity.” Missouri NEA opposes this additional layer
of bureaucracy and unneeded intrusion on local control of
our public higher education institutions. Also, MNEA is
concerned that a rigid mandate to promote “intellectual
diversity” could undermine the cardinal value of academia:
the pursuit of truth. This proposal is akin to state mandates
for “intelligent design” in science instruction,
where the proposals mandate presentation of “diverse”
views on all subjects, even those where the pursuit of truth
has led to the practical certainty of answers to particular
academic questions.
JOINT
MEETING ON MATH AND SCIENCE
On Feb. 27, the Joint Committee on Education held a joint
meeting with the House Special Committee on Student Achievement
and the Senate Education Committee to hear a presentation
by the Missouri Chamber of Commerce on METS (Math, Engineering,
Technology and Science) and State Scholars.
SCHOOL
RETIREMENT BILL PERFECTED IN SENATE
The Senate gave first round approval (Perfection vote) to
Senate Bill 244 (Rob Mayer). The bill was taken up on the
floor and debated. The only amendment to the bill, Senate
Amendment 1, was offered by Sen. Maida Coleman and gives additional
flexibility to the board of trustees of the school retirement
system for St. Louis Public Schools, a separate plan from
the Public School Retirement System and the Public Education
Employee Retirement System. A Third Reading (final passage)
vote on the bill could come as early as March 1.
The companion
House version, House Bill 625 (Tom Dempsey), is on the House
Perfection Calendar awaiting floor debate. Both bills will
enact a five-year extension for two key provisions of PSRS
law: the “25-and-Out” option and the enhanced
2.55 percent benefit factor for retirees with 31 years of
service or more. These provisions will expire on June 30,
2008, if not re-enacted prior to that date.
Missouri
NEA strongly supports both bills. A logical system for teacher
retirement must take several factors into account. Teachers
and other education employees who have 25 or more years in
the profession should continue to have the option of retiring
with a fair return for their years of service. At the same
time, educators who choose to give more years of service,
from 30 to 35 years, should be rewarded with higher levels
of retirement benefits.
STUDENT
ACHIEVEMENT COMMITTEE
The House Special Committee on Student Achievement met on
Feb. 28 to hear the following bills:
- House
Committee Resolution 24 (Kevin Wilson) requests a review
of the special needs student assessment provisions of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act
to better serve the special needs student population. The
resolution was voted “do pass.”
- H.B.
771 (Carl Bearden) creates the Superintendent Targeted Achievement
Record Program and requires the total compensation package
of school administrators to be reported and made available
to the public. The bill was voted “do pass.”
- H.B.
807 (Jane Cunningham) creates a statewide program of public
school open enrollment. Missouri NEA continues to have strong
concerns that the bill would undermine local accountability
for ensuring equitable access to at-risk students and special
needs students and may create greater opportunities for
inter-district student athletics and activities recruitment.
The bill does not fund the true costs to both the sending
and receiving districts and has not been demonstrated to
serve the best interests of all students and schools. The
bill was not voted on, but the committee is expected to
vote next week on a House Committee Substitute that combines
H.B. 807 with H.B. 590 (Brian Baker), another open enrollment
bill heard earlier in the session.
Also,
the committee voted out House Committee Substitute for H.B.
827 (Scott Muschany). The bill revises the structure for educational
placement and service decisions for students placed by the
state in residential care facilities.
SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE
The Senate Education Committee met on Feb. 28 and heard the
following bills:
- Senate
Bill 254 (Gary Nodler) creates the Missouri Legacy Fund
to provide college financial assistance. Missouri NEA supports
the bill.
- Senate
Joint Reolution 8 (Luann Ridgeway) raises the allowable
level of bonded indebtedness for school districts from 15
percent to 20 percent.
- S.B.
436 (Scott Rupp) modifies provisions relating to the First
Steps Program. The bill seeks to remove the sunset on the
First Steps Program. Missouri NEA supports removing the
sunset on the First Steps Program. However, the bill also
seeks to reestablish a version of the private placement
preference for Early Childhood Special Education services
that was repealed by S.B. 500 in 2005. Missouri NEA strongly
opposes reinstatement of this placement preference along
with language focusing attention on comparing private placement
costs with a district’s average cost of early childhood
special education, a figure that has no bearing on any particular
student and which focuses attention on comparing the costs
of service, not the appropriate placement of early childhood
special education students.
S.B. 243
(Rob Mayer) was scheduled but not heard and will be rescheduled
for next week. The bill will increase the compulsory school
attendance age for all children in Missouri to 17 years of
age.
Also,
the committee voted out Senate Committee Substitute for S.B.
160 (Scott Rupp). The bill creates a transfer scholarship
for students who graduate from two-year institutions and seek
to attend four-year institutions. The bill authorizes the
use of A+ Schools scholarship funds at Ranken Tech.
CAPITOL
ACTION DAYS
MNEA’s Capitol Action Days continued on Feb. 28. MNEA
members from Governance District 8 made the trip to the Capitol.
Capitol Action Days are a great chance to meet with legislators
and discuss Missouri NEA’s priority issues and how to
support great public schools.
Capitol
Action Days will be on Tuesdays and Wednesdays continuing
through the first week of May. Your MNEA calendar includes
the dates that members of the MNEA Board of Directors selected
for your governance district.
As your
Capitol Action Day approaches, please contact Otto Fajen (otto.fajen@mnea.org)
by the preceding evening to confirm your plan to attend. If
your travel plans change and you are unable to attend on your
designated day, please call and speak to Judy Glover at 1-800-832-0236
by no later than 9:00 a.m. of the designated day to let us
know of the change. Feel free to contact Otto Fajen by e-mail
to arrange to attend a different Capitol Action Day.
Each Capitol
Action Day will start with a briefing at 10:00 a.m. to provide
you with the most up-to-date information. Participants should
meet MNEA Government Relation’s staff in the Capitol
on the second floor near the rotunda in the Senate side alcove
under the grand staircase.
|