|
NEW
INCLEMENT WEATHER MAKE UP DAY BILL IN CONFERENCE
A new version of language to provide forgiveness for days
missed due to inclement weather is now poised to pass the
legislature. The legislature has already enacted special make
up day forgiveness for the 2006-07 school year in House Committee
Substitute/House Bill 678 (B.J. Marsh), but concerns over
the language may cause the bill to be vetoed. The bill grants
six days of snow day forgiveness this year for districts with
eight or more cancelled days. The bill also exempts school
districts in declared federal disaster areas based on inclement
weather in January 2007 from making up days and time lost
due to the inclement weather, regardless of how many other
days were missed.
Similar
language to H.B. 678 was added by the House to Senate Bill
376 (John Griesheimer) on April 19. A revised version will
be considered in conference committee on April 26 when the
Senate adjourns. This revised language offers blanket, statewide
forgiveness from make up of any days missed during the period
from January 11 to January 22, 2007. The bill also waives
the two-thirds make up requirement for the school calendar
for next school year. This revised language is likely to be
adopted by the conference committee and taken up and passed
by both chambers early next week. This revised language for
S.B. 376 appears to be the language destined to be enacted
and signed into law by the governor.
The broader
question remains as to whether the legislature will adopt
more comprehensive long term requirements regarding school
calendars and make up days, such as in House Committee Substitute/Senate
Committee Substitute/Senate Bill 64 (Jack Goodman). S.B. 64
has been passed by the House and will likely go to conference,
where the more comprehensive school calendar provisions may
be stripped out in order to ensure passage of the original
school start date provision of the bill.
HOUSE
BEGINS DEBATE ON PSRS/PEERS CHANGES IN OMNIBUS RETIREMENT
BILL
The House took up House Committee Substitute/Senate Bill 406
on April 26, but laid the bill back on the Informal Calendar
after about one hour of debate. The bill relates to the Missouri
State Employees Retirement System and includes all the school
retirement provisions voted out in HCS/S.B. 244 (Rob Mayer).
The omnibus bill is an attempt to keep the 25 and Out and
31+ years benefit factors moving through the process. HCS/S.B.
406 includes a five-year extension for two key provisions
of PSRS law: the “25 and Out” option and the enhanced
2.55 percent benefit factor for retirees with 31 years of
service or more. Both provisions will expire on June 30, 2008
if not re-enacted prior to that date.
Missouri
NEA strongly supports both of these provisions in the omnibus
bill. A logical system for teacher retirement must take several
factors into account. Teachers and other education employees
who have 25 or more years in the profession should continue
to have the option of retiring with a fair return for their
years of service. At the same time, educators who choose to
give more years of service, from 30 to 35 years, should be
rewarded with higher levels of retirement benefits.
HCS/S.B.
406 includes an additional benefit for already retired members
over age 75 by July 1, 2008, providing an additional $5/month
per year of service for PSRS retirees and $3/month per year
of service for PEERS retirees. Both benefits will extend for
a five-year period. Also, the HCS includes an addition to
limit increases in final average salary used for calculating
PSRS retirement benefits to no more than ten percent, unless
a member changes to a longer contract or reaches a higher
level of educational attainment.
SENATE
COMMITTEE HEARS “INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY” MANDATE
The Senate Education Committee heard House Bill 213 (Jane
Cunningham) on April 25. The bill defines “intellectual
diversity” for reporting purposes at public higher education
institutions. This bill adds a dozen state-level mandates
regarding bureaucratic requirements for addressing “intellectual
diversity.” Sens. Scott Rupp and Norma Champion each
distributed proposed Senate Committee Substitute versions
of the bill, but the committee took no action to vote on the
bill. A Senate Committee Substitute version will likely be
debated and voted on in executive session next week.
Missouri
NEA strongly opposes this additional layer of bureaucracy
and unneeded intrusion on local control of our public higher
education institutions. The Association also opposes this
rigid mandate to promote “intellectual diversity”
and undermine the cardinal value of academe: the pursuit of
truth. This proposal is akin to state mandates for “intelligent
design” in science instruction, where the proposals
mandate presentation of “diverse” views on all
subjects, even those where the pursuit of truth has led to
the practical certainty of answers to particular academic
questions.
These
mandates do not serve an academic purpose; rather, they serve
a political agenda to promote controversy at all costs and
the politicization of educational programs. A mandate to promote
“intellectual diversity” undermines the effort
to hire the most qualified applicants for faculty positions,
since it creates the expectation that hiring committees will
pry into the personal lives and ideological viewpoints of
applicants and give those factors weight in the hiring process.
This undermines an institution’s pursuit of excellence
and, instead, promotes controversy and politics in the hiring
process.
Action
needed:
Please call, write or e-mail to urge your state senator
to oppose H.B. 213, the “intellectual diversity”
mandate. The following link will connect you to the
MNEA Legislative Action Center Action Alert on H.B.
213. The action alert contains a brief summary and an
editable message box to help you send an e-mail to your
state senator on the issue.
http://capwiz.com/nea/mo/issues/alert/?alertid=9671556&type=ST |
SENATE
MAY DEBATE “BACK DOOR” VOUCHER ATTEMPT
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted Senate Committee Substitute/House
Joint Resolution 1 “do pass” on April 2 by a party
line vote. The Joint Resolution, if passed by both chambers
and approved by statewide vote, prohibits a state court from
instructing or ordering the state legislature or any local
government to levy or increase taxes. The amendment states
that “the appropriation of state revenues is the exclusive
province of the elected members of the general assembly.”
The HJR is an obvious attempt to avoid accountability for
failure to meet the constitutional demand to adequately and
equitably appropriate funds for public education. Also, the
resolution is an attempt to allow private school vouchers
by indirectly repealing constitutional prohibitions on spending
public funds on private schools. Missouri NEA strongly opposes
HJR 1.
Action
needed:
If you haven’t already done so, please call, write
or e-mail to urge your state senator to oppose HJR 1,
the “back door” voucher proposal. The following
link will connect you to the MNEA Legislative Action
Center Action Alert on HJR 1. The action alert contains
a brief summary and an editable message box to help
you send an e-mail to your state senator on the issue.
http://www3.capwiz.com/nea/mo/issues/alert/?alertid=9597156&type=ST&show_alert=1 |
SENATE
MAY TAKE UP ABCTE MANDATE
The Senate Education Committee voted Senate Committee Substitute/House
Committee Substitute/House Bill 620 (Scott Muschany) “do
pass” on April 11. The bill is likely to come up for
debate soon on the Senate floor later in the session. Similar
language is also contained in the House version of S.B. 64
(Jack Goodman). The bill requires the State Board of Education
to create another alternative teacher certification based
on certification by the American Board for Certification of
Teacher Excellence and to establish mentoring standards for
beginning teachers and principals.
The bill
creates a far less rigorous certification route that seems
certain to largely replace the current one, but at a terrible
price in terms of teacher preparation and, ultimately, in
student achievement. The SCS creates a four-year initial ABCTE
certificate that actually leads directly to a permanent, career
certificate. The bill’s requirements are basically a
four-year degree, the two, multiple choice ABCTE tests and
a background check, with no requirement to ever pass the Praxis
II or take any college course work in any teaching competencies.
Missouri
NEA opposes creation of another alternative certification
program that lacks adequate requirements to ensure that those
teachers are properly trained in essential teaching competencies
before achieving full certification. Missouri NEA continues
to recommend that any alternative certification should be
probationary and lead to an initial professional certificate.
Also, the Association recommends that all alternatively certified
teachers should have to pass the Praxis II exam and complete
a course of study that covers all key teaching competencies
before being given a full teaching certificate.
Missouri
NEA supports establishing state teaching standards, so state
policy is clear on what teachers are supposed to know and
be able to do, how those standards will be assessed, and how
mentoring, beginning teacher assistance programs and other
professional development will help teachers meet those teaching
standards.
Action
needed:
Your help is needed. If you haven’t already done
so, please call, write or e-mail to urge your state
senator to oppose SCS/HCS/H.B. 620, the ABCTE mandate
bill. The following link will connect you to the MNEA
Legislative Action Center Action Alert on SCS/HCS/H.B.
620. The action alert contains a brief summary and an
editable message box to help you send an e-mail to your
state senator on the issue. http://www3.capwiz.com/nea/mo/issues/alert/?alertid=9597241&type=ST |
SENATE
COMMITTEE PASSES HOUSE PENSION TAX CUT BILL
The Senate Ways and Means Committee approved Senate Committee
Substitute/House Committee Substitute/House Bill 444 et al.
on April 24. As expected, the bill phases in a state income
tax exemption for social security benefits received over the
course of six years. This will result in a loss of about $25
million per year in state general revenues. Senate appropriations
staff has calculated that even without passage of tax cuts
the state budget will be spending down the balance at the
rate of about $215 million per year. Missouri NEA continues
to oppose HCS/H.B. 444, due to the generally regressive nature
of the tax changes and the long-term harm the bill will due
to adequacy of state revenues.
SENATE
PASSES MOHELA BILL
The Senate gave final passage to Senate Substitute # 6 for
Senate Committee Substitute/Senate Bill 389 (Gary Nodler)
on April 25. S.B. 389 contains many provisions relating to
higher education, including the Missouri Higher Education
Loan Authority asset sale. The bill was perfected last week
after the filibuster on the bill was broken by the rare tactical
move known as moving the “previous question” or
P.Q. When the filibuster was ended by force, the sponsor,
Gary Nodler offered a new substitute that removed $46 million
in funding for projects at institutions in the districts of
the senators who continued the filibuster: Chuck Graham and
Jolie Justus. Senate minority members have shown signs of
seeking to stop passage of further legislation this session
as several Consent Bills were blocked by delaying tactics
on April 26.
The bill
contains many provisions relating to higher education, but
the most notable and controversial portion addresses the sale
of loan assets of MOHELA and the use of such proceeds for
capital projects at various public colleges and universities.
The bill contains language that caps college tuition increases
to the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index unless
a waiver is obtained from the Coordinating Board for Higher
Education. Missouri NEA continues to have strong concerns
regarding the impact of the tuition caps on the quality of
programs and the effect of the MOHELA asset sale on the ability
of that entity to fulfill its core mission of providing financial
assistance to Missouri students.
SENATE
ADOPTS LANGUAGE ON HIGHER EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIPS/GAMBLING
LOSS LIMIT REPEAL, BUT BILL APPEARS DEAD
The Senate, again, debated S.B. 430 (Charlie Shields) on April
23-24 and, Senate Substitute #4 was finally approved after
Sen. Shields increased the gambling boat tax increase from
two percent to 4 ¼ percent. Sen. Shields was recognized
to move for perfection, but chose to lay the bill on the Informal
Calendar. While the filibuster is ended, the bill is apparently
dead, since the higher increase in gambling boat taxes is
opposed by the gambling boat industry, and the bill will likely
not move forward during the remainder of the session.
S.B. 430
creates the Smart Start Scholarship Program. The program is
a significant expansion of the approach of the A+ schools
program to support two-year scholarship grants for graduating
high school seniors. The scholarships would be supported by
a separate funding source generated by repealing the $500
loss limits on riverboat gambling boats and enacting an additional
one percent state assessment on gambling proceeds over $30
million per boat. Scholarships could be used at approved public
and private institutions and proprietary schools in Missouri.
Missouri NEA supports the concept of the bill to expand affordable
access to higher education and increase educational attainment
in Missouri.
SENATE
COMPLETES FLOOR DEBATE ON HOUSE BUDGET BILLS
The Senate finished floor debate on House Budget bills, House
Bills 1 to 13 (Allen Icet), on April 25. All of the bills
were Third Read by the Senate this week and sent back to the
House. The House moved to send H.B.s 1 to 5 to conference
committee and then adjourned for the week. As of this writing,
the Senate has yet to grant a conference on H.B.s 1 to 5.
The budget bills will be sent to conference committee with
about two weeks remaining before the constitutional deadline
of May 11 for passage of this year’s budget. Senate
minority members attempted to offer amendments to restore
some cuts to health care and other services, but the amendments
were defeated and the Senate passed the committee versions
of the bills without protracted debate.
Funding
for K-12 education, higher education and other services such
as health care is already inadequate to meet the real needs
of Missourians. Missouri NEA continues to advocate for comprehensive
tax reform that will produce adequate revenues for public
education and other vital services and allow adoption of a
budget that truly meets the needs of Missouri’s citizens.
HOUSE
PASSES SCHOOL START DATE (AND ABCTE) BILL
The House took up and passed House Committee Substitute/Senate
Bill 64 (Jack Goodman) by a nearly party-line vote of 94-57.
The original S.B. 64 requires a hearing before early school
start dates may be scheduled. The HCS includes several other
bills, including House Bill 620 (Scott Muschany), the American
Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence mandate bill.
Missouri NEA strongly opposes the HCS because of the ABCTE
mandate language in the bill. The bill now returns to the
Senate for further action and the bill will likely go to conference.
Several
House Amendments were adopted on April 25:
- H.A.
3 (Esther Haywood) allows districts to set the sixth birthday
age admission date for first grade as late as October 31.
- HSA
1/HA 4 (Ed Robb) makes a number of technical changes in
the provisions relating to educational services for children
placed by the state in residential care facilities.
- H.A.
1/HSA 1/HA 4 (Brian Baker) allows students in provisional
and unaccredited districts to enroll in the Missouri Virtual
School and requires their district of residence to pay tuition.
- HSA
1/HA 5 (Rebecca McClanahan) broadens the ABCTE language
to include all “non-traditional” certifications
that are approved by the State Board of Education.
The original
bill requires a hearing before a school board may set an opening
date more than ten days prior to Labor Day and provides an
exemption to the make up days requirement based on inclement
weather by increasing the length of the school day. The HCS
adds forgiveness for days lost due to inclement weather closing
that exempts days eight through 12 from make up requirement
for the 2006-07 school year. For all years, the HCS also requires
districts to build six make up days into the school calendar
and then make up the first six days lost plus half of the
days lost over six days.
HCS/SCS/S.B.
64 also adds the perfected version of H.B. 827 (Scott Muschany)
relating to educational services for children placed by the
state in residential care facilities and a revised version
of H.B. 620 (Scott Muschany) to establish state mentoring
standards and mandate an alternative certification using the
ABCTE test. Missouri NEA strongly opposes this new, weaker,
alternative certification mandate.
HOUSE
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
The committee met on April 24 and heard the following bills:
- H.B.
1205 (Sam Page) authorizes an exemption from motor fuel
tax on fuel used for school buses. The bill was later voted
“do pass.”
- H.B.
1219 (Rodney Schad) establishes that an education renewal
commission be appointed when a school district with more
than 10,000 students becomes unaccredited.
- S.B.
132 (Scott Rupp) allows the state Board of Education to
invest in government securities offered at a discount or
at less than par value. The bill was later voted “do
pass.”
- S.B.
140 (Scott Rupp) allows school boards to identify a designee
to bind the school district in a settlement agreement reached
during the resolution session of a special education due
process hearing. The bill was later voted “do pass.”
SENATE
COMMITTEE TO HEAR RESIDENTIAL CARE EDUCATION BILL
The Senate Seniors, Families and Public Health Committee heard
House Bill 827 (Scott Muschany) on April 23. The bill will
be voted on in executive session next week. H.B. 827 requires
the Department of Social Services to provide for the educational
needs of children placed in licensed residential care facilities.
The “family support team” established for each
such child shall meet with school staff to make the determination
as to the educational need of the child. Services may be provided
by certified teachers employed by the facility with reimbursement
from the school district or the school district in which the
facility is located may provide services if the child can
be served in a regular public school setting. The bill provides
that the district may only determine the child to be “homebound”
for the purpose of providing instruction if the family support
team agrees to that designation.
Missouri
NEA supports the assumption expressed in the bill that every
child in public school deserves a full educational school
day. The Association believes that representatives of residential
care facilities and school staff should collaborate in decision-making
regarding educational services and that school districts and
residential facilities must be fully compensated for all services
provided to such students.
The focus
of remaining discussion on the bill has been whether staff
of a residential care facility or school district staff will
have control in the determination of the education services
to be provided for such students. The bill specifies that
the “family support team” and school district
staff are expected to work together to create the educational
plan for each such student.
URBAN
EDUCATION ISSUES
The House Special Committee on Urban Education Reform met
on April 24 to continue the hearing on House Bill 1272 (Talibdin
El-Amin) to establish the Metropolitan School District Improvement
Act regarding public schools in the City of St. Louis. This
bill is very similar to Senate Bill 690 (Jeff Smith). The
committee voted a House Committee Substitute version out “do
pass” on April 26. The HCS removes provisions calling
for breaking the St. Louis City district into subdistricts
and language requiring a longer school year and school day
for St. Louis Public Schools.
The bill
includes many provisions, most of which are limited to apply
only to St. Louis Public Schools. The provisions include “mega-looping,”
differential pay for teachers, performance pay for improving
schools, additional requirements for student assessments,
teacher assessments, alternative education, early childhood
education, school uniforms, after-school programs, and longer
school day and longer school year. While the Association supports
the positive portions of the bill, other provisions raise
strong concerns, including the differential pay for teachers
and the extra mandates on student assessment and teacher assessment.
SEX
EDUCATION MANDATE PASSES HOUSE
The House gave final passage to House Bill 1055 (Therese Sander)
on April 23. The bill includes various provisions relating
to abortion services and alternatives to abortions and includes
the provisions of Senate Bill 432 (Gary Nodler) to establish
additional mandates on human sexuality instruction in public
schools. Missouri NEA continues to oppose the additional mandates
and restrictions on human sexuality instruction contained
in the bill as unneeded restrictions on local control of curriculum
and instruction.
HOUSE
DEFEATS PREVAILING WAGE REPEAL
The House debated House Bill 61 (Marilyn Ruestman) on April
23 and defeated the bill by a vote of 58-94. The bill would
exempt work done on a school in a noncharter county from the
prevailing hourly wage requirement if approved by the school
board. A broad coalition of labor organizations, including
Missouri NEA, opposed this weakening of the prevailing wage
law and was able to defeat the bill handily on the House floor.
FINDING
INFORMATION ABOUT BILLS
To find out more about legislation this session, go to: http://www.mnea.org/capitol/legissues.htm.
This page
contains numerous links, including the NEA Legislative Action
Center, which addresses key education issues at the federal
level, and the Missouri NEA Legislative Action Center, which
will address key education issues at the state level. This
page also will contain links to legislative updates, the MNEA
Legislative Platform, legislative priorities and other policy-related
links.
To find
information about a specific bill currently pending before
the Missouri General Assembly, go to:
http://www.house.mo.gov/jointsearch/.
Type the
bill number (example: HB1000) or sponsor name in the “search”
box to find a link to the bill. This link will take you to
a “home page” for the bill that provides bill
text, bill summaries, fiscal notes and information on legislative
action on the bill.
CAPITOL
ACTION DAYS
MNEA’s Capitol Action Days continued this week. Nearly
a dozen MNEA members from Governance District 10, including
members from Ft. Zumwalt and Pattonville, made the trip to
the Capitol. Capitol Action Days are a great chance to meet
with legislators and discuss Missouri NEA’s priority
issues and how to support great public schools for every child.
Capitol
Action Days will be on Tuesdays and Wednesdays continuing
through the first week of May. Your MNEA calendar includes
the dates that members of the MNEA Board of Directors selected
for your governance district.
As your
Capitol Action Day approaches, please contact Otto Fajen (otto.fajen@mnea.org)
by the preceding evening to confirm your plan to attend. If
your travel plans change and you are not able to attend on
your designated day, please call and speak to Judy Glover
at 1-800-392-0236 by no later than 9:00 a.m. of the designated
day to let us know of the change. Feel free to contact Otto
Fajen by e-mail to arrange to attend a different Capitol Action
Day.
Each Capitol
Action Day will start with a briefing at 10:00 a.m. to provide
you with the most up-to-date information. Participants should
meet MNEA Government Relations staff at the Capitol on the
second floor near the rotunda in the Senate side alcove under
the grand staircase.
|