Workers’ Compensation Act changes,
rob workers of rights
Recently, Gov. Matt Blunt signed workers’ compensation
legislation passed by the Missouri General Assembly. The law
carries with it many changes, most of which are designed to
strengthen management’s ability to deny benefits to
injured workers. While the changes are numerous, the changes
that are of most concern for Missouri NEA members are listed
below.
The definition of what constitutes an “accident”
has changed so that people who are hurt while performing their
normal jobs, without having an unusual trauma, will find it
more difficult to collect benefits.
Changes
that are of most concern
to members
The
definition of what constitutes an “accident”
has changed so that people who are hurt while performing
their normal jobs, without having an unusual trauma,
will find it more difficult to collect benefits.
Workers
who have pre-existing medical conditions
that are aggravated or worsened by their employment
will find it more difficult to collect benefits. Work
activities must now be “the prevailing factor”
and not “a substantial factor” in causing
the injury. This higher standard will allow the insurers
to deny more cases.
The
statute of limitations will begin running
on occupational disease claims (including repetitive
trauma injuries such as carpal tunnel syndrome) as soon
as workers know they have an injury.
Failure
to use safety devices at work will result in
at least a 25 percent penalty to workers, and possibly
as high as 50 percent. This is a stark contrast to the
employer’s penalty, which remains at 15 percent
if it violates a safety statute.
Use
of alcohol results in 50 percent loss of benefits, and
refusal to take an alcohol test results
in forfeiture of all benefits. Questions remain as to
whether the reduction also applies to medical expenses.
Management
may require workers to use all accumulated sick
leave while attending medical treatment and
evaluations. This may cause a person to exhaust all
of his or her sick leave if he or she is required to
attend extended physical therapy.
Workers
who receive unemployment benefits while off work due
to injury are disqualified from receiving disability
benefits. Before, a person would simply have to reimburse
unemployment once he or she received lost-time benefits
under workers’ compensation. Workers who are terminated
for misconduct following an accident are disqualified
from receiving disability benefits. This may provide
incentive to employers to find ways to terminate people
for misconduct to remove their obligation to pay lost-time
benefits.
In
occupational disease claims, including repetitive
trauma injuries, claims will be barred unless the worker
reports the injury to management within 30 days of the
diagnosis of the condition. As a result, as soon as
a person is diagnosed with the condition, he or she
will be required to report it to the employer or run
the risk of having the claim barred forever. |
Workers who have pre-existing medical conditions that are
aggravated or worsened by their employment will find it more
difficult to collect benefits. Work activities must now be
“the prevailing factor” and not “a substantial
factor” in causing the injury. This higher standard
will allow the insurers to deny more cases.
The statute of limitations will begin running on occupational
disease claims (including repetitive trauma injuries such
as carpal tunnel syndrome) as soon as workers know they have
an injury.
Failure to use safety devices at work will result in at least
a 25 percent penalty to workers, and possibly as high as 50
percent. This is a stark contrast to the employer’s
penalty, which remains at 15 percent if it violates a safety
statute.
Use of alcohol results in 50 percent loss of benefits, and
refusal to take an alcohol test results in forfeiture of all
benefits. Questions remain as to whether the reduction also
applies to medical expenses.
Management may require workers to use all accumulated sick
leave while attending medical treatment and evaluations. This
may cause a person to exhaust all of his or her sick leave
if he or she is required to attend extended physical therapy.
Workers who receive unemployment benefits while off work
due to injury are disqualified from receiving disability benefits.
Before, a person would simply have to reimburse unemployment
once he or she received lost-time benefits under workers’
compensation.
Workers who are terminated for misconduct following an accident
are disqualified from receiving disability benefits. This
may provide incentive to employers to find ways to terminate
people for misconduct to remove their obligation to pay lost-time
benefits.
In occupational disease claims, including repetitive trauma
injuries, claims will be barred unless the worker reports
the injury to management within 30 days of the diagnosis of
the condition. As a result, as soon as a person is diagnosed
with the condition, he or she will be required to report it
to the employer or run the risk of having the claim barred
forever.
Probably the most telling aspect of the changes is the fact
that Gov. Blunt removed these words from the law that have
been present for decades: “all of the provisions of
[the workers’ compensation law] shall be liberally construed
with a view to the public welfare.” Each of these changes
will result in a larger number of claims being denied, and
if an injured worker is contacted by an insurance company
before knowing his or her rights, the chances claims being
denied will be that much greater.
Most significantly, the current law also affects cases that
are accepted by the insurance company. In the past, workers
often did not need an attorney to represent them in their
workers’ compensation cases. The Division of Workers’
Compensation had created a docket dedicated to unrepresented
or “pro se” workers. Legal advisors met with injured
workers and representatives from the insurance carriers to
assist the parties in coming to a fair resolution. Since injured
workers were often unaware of all of their rights, the legal
advisor was allowed to educate the injured worker to make
certain that the settlements were fair.
Under the current law, all legal advisors have been abolished,
and judges are now required to approve any settlement that
comes before them as long as the settlement is not the result
of “undue influence or fraud.” This places injured
workers at the mercy of insurance adjusters who can use their
knowledge of the workers’ compensation laws to encourage
unknowing workers to settle their cases for fractions of their
true value. Moreover, the adjuster’s influence could
irreparably harm an injured worker who inadvertently closes
out his or her rights for future medical care.
If you are hurt at work, speak with an attorney before providing
any statements to an insurance adjuster. Furthermore, if an
insurance adjuster makes you an offer, discuss the offer with
an attorney before signing any documents. The attorney will
help you make certain that all of your rights are fully protected
and that all benefits are properly paid as required under
the law.
by David Jerome Schuchat, Cook & Werner P.C.
|