Supreme Court Enters
Order
in Thruston v. Jefferson City School District
Verdict | Background
Verdict
The Supreme Court entered an order in the collective bargaining
case that was argued in November; however, the order did not
address the issue of collective bargaining. The Court remanded
the case back to the Court of Appeals to deal with the procedural
issue of whether or not the case was moot. In short, the Court
avoided the substantive issue MNEA had hoped would be addressed.
Background
Thruston et al. v. Jefferson City School District was argued
before the Supreme Court on November 6, 2002. The case was
initiated in 2000 when Cheryl Thruston, a teacher in the Jefferson
City School District, Fern Ward, a principal in the Jefferson
City School District, and Luana Gifford, their representative
with AFT, filed suit against Jefferson City School District.
Cheryl Thruston's portion of the suit alleged
that the school district violated Article I, Section 29 of
the Missouri Constitution (granting employees the right to
engage in collective bargaining) and the First Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution by forbidding her to discuss her working
conditions outside the school and by giving her job targets
and low evaluations only after learning of her activity with
the AFT.
Fern Ward's claims arose from the school district's
denial of her attempt to file a grievance. Ward also alleged
violations of the First Amendment by virtue of the school's
refusal to allow her to file a grievance and to choose a representative
to resolve issues regarding her employment.
The Cole County Circuit Court dismissed the
petition for failure to state a claim. The Court relied on
the Missouri Supreme Court's 1947 decision in City of Springfield
v. Clouse, which held that Article I, Section 29 of the Missouri
Constitution does not apply to public employees. Plaintiffs
appealed, and the Western District Court of Appeals dismissed
the appeal as moot, because Thruston and Ward were no longer
employed by the District.
Plaintiffs then sought transfer to the Supreme
Court, which was granted on August 27, 2002. One of the issues
on appeal is whether the Clouse decision should be overruled.
The briefs of all parties can be viewed online.
The Supreme Court oral argument can be heard online
as well.
|